Taxpayer Funding of Abortion?
No matter how hard I try to stay away form this issue it keeps coming back to bite me in the back side. So let be for real. we know that one way or the other taxs dollars will be spent on abortion.
So lets get the money back within a tax / or this health care fourm.
But first let me say I do not believe in killing a child even if it is un born. It is still life.
1st. Life or death for a woman.
We do feel that if a woman is to die because she is pregnate, so we believe in her right to live, so a proper forum of cost to pay back some of the money according to the income. It could be as little as $1.00 to $10.00 per month added to the tax forum in and for health care reform..
2nd.Victim of Rape.
According to law she is a victim of a crime so their should be no cost to her but pass cost to the one convicted in this matter. But if she wish to in good faith to allow this child life, then she is intitled to health care suppot and other help.
3rd.Ooops Im pregnant,
Oh hell.....you know what Im going to duck this one........
because there are hundreds of ways to keep from getting pregnant, even through free hand out messures at health care offices.
Will the Senate Allow Taxpayer Funding of Abortion?
 |
 | |
Will the Senate Allow Taxpayer Funding of Abortion? Dear Henry, While the overall bill passed by the House of Representatives could be described as a massive intrusion into the economy and the private healthcare choices that President Obama wants to foist upon the American taxpayer, the vote to stop government funding of abortion in the House of Representatives shows the importance of the pro-life movement in the health care debate. Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) was able to insert language into the bill that prohibits federal funding from paying for abortion, or paying the part of the cost of any plan that covers abortion. But the fight is far from over. Already groups like NARAL and Planned Parenthood have started lobbying Democratic Senators and the White House to strip the amendment from the bill. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), the Democrats' chief deputy whip in the House, said that she and other pro-abortion rights lawmakers would work to strip the amendment in conference after the upper chamber passes its bill. She said she is "confident" the Stupak language would be removed. Left wing blogs are reporting that President Obama has reassured pro-abortion lawmakers that he will personally see that this language was taken out. We cannot let that happen. Sign our petition today. Let them know that you will not accept any plans that will use tax dollars to fund abortion. As the Senate begins the process of bringing their bill to a vote we need to make one thing abundantly clear ... the majority of Americans do not want their tax dollars used to fund abortion. The House listened and it is time for the Senate to do the same. Please sign our petition letting the leadership in the Senate know that you insist that your tax dollars not be used to cover abortion and that health care legislation must explicitly exclude abortion coverage. Sign our Petition. Tell the Senate, No Taxpayer Funding of Abortion Sincerely, | |
 | |||
 |  |  | FRC Action: 801 G Street N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 |
W: Go to Previous message | Go to Next message| Back to Messages From: "Bill@billnelson.senate.gov" <Bill@billnelson.senate.gov> Add sender to Contacts To: fascmovement@yahoo.com Please do not reply to this e-mail. If you need to send another message to Senator Nelson, please use the form on his Web site: http://billnelson.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm#email |